Rupture and Repair: Part 3

Rupture and Repair: Part 3

by Meagan Good, MA, LPC; Founder of Take Heart

March 21, 2024

Years ago I experienced another powerful example of repair. I was working with a child whose life experience aged her far beyond her years. These kiddos often get in trouble because their behaviors and activities are more mature than is appropriate for their age or emotional developmental level. They find themselves in relationships they are not ready for, or asked to behave in ways they are not emotionally mature enough for, or forced to take on responsibilities that are not their own or not meant for a child.

This young lady, Sarah (name changed to protect confidentiality), had experienced all of the above. Unbeknownst to me, Sarah was being asked by her mother to lie about the identity of her father, who was not supposed to be in contact with Sarah. One day, her father came to one of our sessions to watch her ride her horse. He was introduced to me as an uncle, and I had no reason to doubt it. Sarah’s interactions with him were slightly guarded and she was a little tense in her interactions with the horse, but I chalked it up to feeling awkward having an observer. We kept our discussion casual and I turned it from more deep or private conversation to Sarah sharing with her “uncle” what she had been learning with the horse she worked with regularly, Charley.

 

Once she had tacked Charley up and was ready to ride, we walked down to the ring where her “uncle” stood leaning on the fence to watch her ride. As she began to warm up Charley, walking in circles, each time they passed her “uncle,” Charley would side-step in towards the middle of the ring, away from the fence. Still thinking she may just be feeling some performance anxiety about her “uncle” watching her ride, I coached her through some relaxation and grounding work to help her get present with Charley and focused on her connection to Charley over the anxiety. As they approached Sarah’s “uncle” for the fourth time, suddenly Charley bucked – not very big, but enough that it threw Sarah off-balance and she slid off him from the side. Charley took a few steps into the center, then turned around to face her and the man behind her. He clearly wanted to keep both people well in his sight, and not turn his back to them.

 

I quickly assessed that Sarah was fine physically, just embarrassed. Confused, I wondered what on earth had just happened. This was out of character for Charley, and for Sarah, we done a lot of riding and mindfulness before – so I didn’t feel she did something that explained Charley’s reaction. After seeing she was unharmed, I asked her “uncle” to go back to the car to wait while I worked through what had happened with Sarah on her own. I replaced Charley’s bridle with a halter, tied Charley to a safe place, then returned to Sarah’s side. Sarah began crying and said it was her fault Charley was upset with her. She admitted that she had been lying about the identity of her “uncle” and that the man was really her father, but both parents asked her to lie since her father was not supposed to have contact with her. She explained that her parents were trying to work out their relationship to get back together, which she really wanted.

 

Inappropriately, this child had been mantled with the responsibility of lying to protect his identity while the adults figured out the legal and custodial part of their relationship and their parenting. The request was unfair, inappropriate, and unsafe. It put pressure on this child that she was unequipped to handle on many levels. Completely aside from the rupture this causes in the parent-child relationship, this situation created such tension within Sarah that it ruptured her relationship with Charley. Once I knew the backstory, Charley’s side-stepping and buck made much more sense: he was responding to the discomfort and tension between Sarah and her father. Charley didn’t trust what he was feeling from the man, who he had no previous relationship, and he didn’t feel safe with the tension he was feeling from the child he thought he could trust. He tried telling us something was wrong, and when nothing changed, he told us in a way we couldn’t miss! There was rupture on both sides: Sarah had lied to Charley, and Charley bucked Sarah off his back.

Repair was needed from both ends. I asked Sarah if she felt safe to do some groundwork with Charley to repair the relationship. The two needed to reconnect and reestablish safety with one another. I clipped a long leadline to Charley’s halter so Sarah could communicate with him from a safe distance. We had done lots of groundwork before, so Sarah didn’t need much instruction from me to ask Charley to begin walking around her. I explained that our goal was to look for relaxation and reconnection, and that these would indicate that trust was being rebuilt. When trust started showing up, the body language of both her and Charley would begin to soften, so I knew what to look for.

 

Charley is a pretty obedient horse, and responded to her request to walk around her quickly. While he was not overtly anxious in his movement, his body and face held a hardness that told us he wasn’t ready to make up. Sarah’s shoulders stayed tight and her movements were maybe a bit more rigid than usual, so she wasn’t really ready either, but she asked Charley to come join her in the center of the circle. Charley turned his body to face her, but refused to come closer. I encouraged her to ask him to walk again, take a deep breath, soften her gaze and shoulders, and look for more softness in Charley’s body before asking him to come in.

 

Charley walked obediently as soon as Sarah even began her request. Horses often process their own emotion through movement, and it felt to me that he had some processing of his own to do before he could vulnerably reconnect with Sarah. After a few large, slow circles, I began to notice Sarah’s face soften. Her eyes had a new focus. Her shoulders relaxed and her posture shifted from guarded to more inviting. Charley hadn’t changed much yet, but Sarah asked him to come in again – I believe because she noticed the shift in herself. Charley came in to her this time, but he still had a hardness to his eye that revealed his true feelings.

 

We discussed what we saw in Charley and what we noticed about what we sensed going on between them, and agreed that Charley had come in out of compliance, but not out of a genuine readiness to connect. Sarah began to cry again and stroked Charley’s neck. She apologized to him – and while I don’t believe he understood her words, I believe he sensed the continuing shift in her emotions from tension and anxiety, to determination to repair (which was genuine, but not all that was needed to actually make the repair), to true repentance and vulnerability.

 

Sarah then asked if she could try again, and I encouraged her to see if she could get Charley to choose to connect with her from a place of genuine interest and full consent.* Back to the circle went Charley, with the same obedience and tension in his face. But this time, Sarah was different. Her body language was fully relaxed and open to connection. Her concentration was clearly on him, fully attuned to Charley in her movements matching his as he walked around her. With this whole-hearted shift in Sarah, it didn’t take long for Charley’s eye to finally soften as well. He shook his head as he walked then began to lick and chew, the infamous sign of finally releasing that long-held tension. It only took a small change in Sarah’s gaze to invite Charley in, and he began walking over with purpose in each step, ears pricked forward and eyes brightly focused on her. This time, the connection was tangible as he placed his forehead right at her chest, almost inviting the hug and cuddles.

Repair is not immediate. Frankly, it was something of a miracle that the repair could be made in this same hour-long session with Sarah and Charley – because sometimes it takes a lot longer. And it’s okay if it takes longer, as long as small progress is being made. Baby steps still get us in the right direction.

 

In this story, Sarah and Charley both had to get to a point of felt safety and relaxation in their own bodies before they could reconnect with each other. The rhythmic movement of walking (for Charley) and circling (for Sarah) played a regulating factor for them. As their bodies relaxed, their hearts and minds could open up to the relationship again. There was a level of bottom-up regulation happening: even though the activity of circling and requesting connection does involve every part of the brain, it started with more movement, and grew into a more emotional and cognitively chosen experience.

 

Additionally, both were committed to the repair. Most horse girls will understand the innate desire to connect with their horse – so this may be easy to see from Sarah’s side, but you may be questioning, how is a horse committed to repair? Horses are designed with an innate desire to live peaceably with their herd. Their very instinct drives them to connect with one another. Belonging in the herd is how they survive. Since most of these instincts are based in survival and not cognitively thought out and chosen, they sometimes still look like compliance. This is why many horses are so quick to comply – which in the horse world, we call “willing to please” because it sure makes it easier on us to have an obedient horse! We have to work with these compliant horses to rewire them to connect INSTEAD OF complying, because we want them to choose. Compliance comes from the “please” response out of survival brain. Choice comes from the thinking brain and is utilized when we are regulated and feeling safe. Charley was committed to the repair on an instinctive level at the very least, and once he began to feel safe and perceive safety from Sarah’s body relaxing and releasing her own tension, he was able to release his own tension, allowing him to genuinely choose to connect.

 

Deep connection is impossible without the cycle of rupture and repair. Of course there is so much nuance to repair once we get into real-life situations, that prayer and guidance from trusted individuals is extremely helpful in navigating repair well. But being committed to the repair is the foundation of any healthy relationship that becomes fulfilling in one’s life, whether it be in family, romantic relationships, with children, in friendships, or at work. Repair requires intentionality, introspection, vulnerability, and discomfort – but the reward of healthy relationships is always worth the hard work.

*One could argue that a horse on a lead line, no matter how long, does not have the ability to give full consent. I believe that context matters in determining this, and that we aren’t always in a perfect situation or context – so we do the best we can. I chose that day to keep Charley on the lead line just in case the repair went sideways. The lead line was chosen for safety, since it would allow me to step in more easily if needed. However, anytime we use a lead line, we are not pulling or using coercion. We are offering as much choice as possible within the context of the lead line.

Ready to start your
life changing journey?

Wherever you are at on your journey, we are here for you. Our human and equine team will walk alongside you so you can find hope, healing, and wholeness in your life. You are worth it. Don't hesitate, reach out to us today.